Marketing Assets and Firm Value
In a meta-analysis based on 83 studies, Alexander Edeling and Marc Fischer make the case for marketing investment (from Empirical Generalizations about Marketing Impact, 2nd ed.).
Advertising and firm value
The mean firm-value elasticity with respect to advertising expenditures is .04, while the mean firm-value elasticity with respect to marketing-asset variables (including brand and customer relationship) is .54. The elasticities are smaller when firm value is measured as stock returns, as opposed to market capitalization.
Meta-analysis based on 488 elasticities drawn from 83 studies
Given that the vast majority of marketing firm-value elasticities is positive, investing in marketing is value-relevant. The potential for growing firm value is especially large with respect to marketing assets. The results suggest that firms are still underinvested in brands and customer relationships, since the firm-value elasticities should be zero at optimal investment levels.
Marc Fischer, University of Cologne and University of Technology, Sydney, and Alexander Edeling, University of Cologne
Edeling, Alexander, and Marc Fischer (2014), “Marketing’s Impact on Firm Value: Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis.” Cambridge, Mass.: Marketing Science Institute, Report No. 14–107
3 WAYS to GET CONNECTED
Employees of MSI Member Companies enjoy the benefits of complete online access to content, member conferences and networking with the MSI community.
Qualified academics benefit from a relationship with MSI through access to MSI.org, conferences and research opportunities.
The public is invited to enjoy partial access to msi.org content, a free e-newsletter, selected reports and more.